Just want to know what you think based on your experience. For proposed gene names that are not already approved, please submit the gene symbols to the appropriate nomenclature committees as soon as possible, as these must be deposited and approved before publication of an article. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. 43.75%, Author: Soto, Albert Created Date: 01/14/2014 08:36:00 Last modified by: Soto, Albert Company: 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida . Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts, Publications Manager, Publication Support Services, Editage. Journal names are italicized and abbreviated (with full stops) according to common usage. In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to npj Vaccines. 2016513Chem Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. n - - Authorship Criteria Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below: Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and Use the same typeface (Arial or Helvetica) for all figures. At this size, the optimum font size is 8pt. Please note that the use of any editing service is at the author's own expense and in no way implies that the article will be selected for peer review or accepted for publication. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). A competing interests statement is required for all accepted papers published in the npj Series journals. You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. Open access articles are published under a CC BY licence (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence). The submission process has completed with either an Accept or Reject decision. Meeting abstracts that are not published and papers in preparation should be mentioned in the text with a list of authors (or initials if any of the authors are co-authors of the present contribution). These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). If the manuscript was peer reviewed the referee comments are also transferrable on request by the author. | SCI | | | | | | PMC . It is also appropriate to include suggested or excluded referees in the cover letter. | When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. npj Vaccines - DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. When acknowledging funding, our recommended best practice is that authors should acknowledge funders and grants on publications when the activities that contributed to that publication are within scope of the acknowledged grant and arise directly from a specific grant. Cell Biol. Internet Explorer). https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories). The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. If this a 'Reject and Transfer' type of decision and no previous editor has done so, you will be prompted to select target journals for the transfer offer before the Notify Author page appears. Declaring funding in the Acknowledgments can take one of the following forms: This study was funded by [funder name] [grant number where applicable]. Acceptable formats are:ai, .eps, .pdf, .ps and .svg for fully editable vector-based art; layered .psd and .tif for editable layered art; .psd, .tif, .png and .jpg for bitmap images; .ppt if fully editable and without styling effects; ChemDraw (.cdx) for chemical structures. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. 33 51.67%. For new biopolymeric materials (oligosaccharides, peptides, nucleic acids, etc. | E-mail permission messages are acceptable. All Rights Reserved. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. (()--2020-0033) The Associate Editor evaluates the submission, potentially in collaboration with other Editors (including in-house Managing Editors), and decides whether it should be sent for peer review based on the editorial criteria of the journal of novelty and significance and overall technical quality. These requirements aim to improve the transparency of reporting and the reproducibility of published results. 156, 35-39 (2002). The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. 0, 49 What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? Manuscripts published in the npj Series journals are not subject to in-depth copy editing or display item redrawing as part of the production process. X-MOL //--> Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. Responses to requests for admissions are due within 30 days after service, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of process and the initial pleading on that defendant. Follow this link for a list of all journals in the Nature portfolio and subject areas. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Is long period a good or bad sign? Use symbol font for Greek letters. 0, 80 Authors should use approved nomenclature for gene symbols, and use symbols rather than italicized full names (for example Ttn, not titin). Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. 3Nature CommunicationsTips - 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 The decision is sent to the author. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence or rainbow pseudo-coloured images, to colour-safe combinations such as green and magenta, turquoise and red, yellow and blue or other accessible colour palettes is strongly encouraged. Authors should be listed last name first, followed by a comma and initials (followed by full stops) of given names. Grant details and acknowledgments are not permitted as numbered references. Should your manuscript be accepted, you will receive more extensive instructions for final submission of display items. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? We prefer vector files with editable layers. Volume numbers and the subsequent comma appear in bold. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals, and the Editors may decide to seek additional reviews or assign another Editor, returning the manuscript to an earlier status. An Editor is assigned to the manuscript. Before a manuscript is submitted, please review our Editorial policies, and ensure that the submission complies with our policy requirements. This process may involve further consultation with the Reviewers and editor-mediated communications between the Reviewers. 2002 A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. The length of time this stage takes does not affect the decision in any way, it's neither a good nor a bad sign. Published papers: Thank you for visiting nature.com. The process involves both the journal editors and independent expert reviewers, who evaluate . At submission, authors may suggest referees; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. The npj Series operate a single-anonymized peer review process. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. waiting to send decision to author npj What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Author KL has previously acted as a paid consultant for [company name B] but declares no non-financial competing interests. Books: Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. Research papers published by the journals represent important advances bringing new insight to a specialized area of research. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor contacts the author with the decision. Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. Standard abbreviations for reagents and solvents are encouraged. Every article that contains statistical testing should state the name of the statistical test, the n value for each statistical analysis, the comparisons of interest, a justification for the use of that test (including, for example, a discussion of the normality of the data when the test is appropriate only for normal data), the alpha level for all tests, whether the tests were one-tailed or two-tailed, and the actual P value for each test (not merely "significant" or "P < 0.05"). Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. Nat. Supplementary Information is not edited, typeset or proofed, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented at initial submission, and that the style and terminology conform to the rest of the paper. Mechanistic Aspect. Experimental protocols that describe the synthesis of compounds should be included. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. Robert Eagling161167100-150Cell PressChem Nature Chemistry Guy15Chem , 1, 4NRTNRTNRT, NRTNHCNRTNHCNRT10000NHCCorrections163ACS National Meeting, ACSGuyGuyNature Chemistry Chem GuyChem GuypptsubmittedacceptedNature Chemistry Guy, 10emailC&EN Stable phosphorus carbene analog debutsRory WatermanPreviewA Bottle-able Phosphinidene, a new chapter in phosphorus chemistry beginsFigure 3, DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Acknowledgements should be brief, and should not include thanks to anonymous Reviewersand Editors, or effusive comments. Printed journals: New submissions that remain Incomplete more than 90 days will be removed. Onc.) Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores ( ScholarOne ), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. waiting to send decision to author npj - leapfrogonlineservices.com The following types of contribution to npj Series journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Brief Communications, Case Report, Comment, Matters Arising, Meeting Report, Perspective, Protocol, Resource, Reviews. When referencing a dataset, a DOI or accession code should be included in the citation where available. Needs Approval or Revision Needs Approval. Smith, S.) 180-181 (Macmillan, 2013). //-->Find submission status of your article / manuscript - Support Look up the journal's: Aims & scope Instructions for authors Editorial Board Blind peer review This journal checks for plagiarism . Authors should provide a statement confirming the source, identity and purity of known compounds and biomolecules that are central to the scientific study, even if they are purchased or resynthesised using published methods. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. If this is not possible in a combined manuscript file, authors should either submit separate high resolution figure files or deposit image data in a suitable repository (e.g. The Reviewer identities and their full reports willbe transferred, and although the journal Editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, the Editors will likely choose to take advice from additional or alternative referees. , However, some guidelines for final figure preparation are included below if you wish to minimize later revisions and possible delays. The Editor assigns potential Reviewers to the manuscript and the author is notified. The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. Before submission, the corresponding author ensures that all authors are included in the author list and agree with its order, and that they are aware the manuscript is to be submitted. 4.5. Editorial policies | npj Clean Water , 2016513. ]]> PDF Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial How do I check the status of my manuscript? The Editors have begun a decision in the system. All authors must also complete an editorial policy checklist to ensure compliance with Nature Portfolio editorial policies. Best practices for authors of healthcare-related articial intelligence manuscripts Since its inception in 2017, npj Digital Medicine has attracted a disproportionate number of manuscripts reporting on uses of . sciencenature - | How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Collections and special issues follow the standard peer review policy. The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". The funder played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. waiting to send decision to author npj - oxawa.com Authors should describe the experimental protocol in detail, referring to amounts of reagents in parentheses, when possible (e.g. The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models. Sources for kits should be identified. Protocols deposited by the authors will be linked to the Online Methods section upon publication. 0, 89 Correspondence and all forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. At this stage, the editor completes an initial screening of the manuscript, and if he/she finds it suitable for the journal, it is sent for peer review. Authors must justify the use of a particular test and explain whether their data conform to the assumptions of the tests. Timing Service of Requests and Time for Responses. Reviewer selection is critical to the publication process, and we base our choice on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations and our own previous experience of a Reviewer's characteristics. The Methods must include a statistics and reproducibility section with the following information. Based on the Reviewer recommendations, you can use the action buttons to make a decision. Am. [CDATA[// >