Sex refers to the anatomical and other biological differences between females and males that are determined at the moment of conception and develop in the womb and throughout childhood and adolescence. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.org. Low-income countries (N = 6; Nrespondents = 35,457) include Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Peru, and Philippines. Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. The resulting nation-level longitudinal database summarizes the responses of 495,011 individuals surveyed between 1981 and 2014 in 110 countries based on stratified random sampling procedures. Inspired by Maslows (1954) hierarchy of human needs, the findings of Inglehart and his co-authors (Inglehart & Norris, 2003; Inglehart & Welzel, 2005) demonstrate a universal principle in the functioning of the human mind: the utility ladder of freedoms, as Welzel (2013) has coined it. We have data on all three dimensions for 68 countries for four cohorts, and limited data for the first cohort for 21 countries. To verify uni-dimensionality, we also perform a factor analysis on the items that form each dimension. (2006) qualitatively reviewed 180 empirical studies using Hofstedes dimensions published in 40 business and psychology journals and book series between 1980 and 2002. If so, WITI is the place for you! In the workplace, superiors and subordinates are not likely to see each other as equals, and it is assumed that bosses will make decisions without consulting employees. This article describes briefly the Hofstede's four dimensions of national cultures: Power Distance, Individualism vs. Collectivism, Masculinity vs. Femininity and Uncertainty Avoidance and describes Turkey in terms of these dimensions. Hofstede agrees with this modified notion of modernization theory implying the existence of multiple paths to modernity (cf. The country-specific scores in CollectivismIndividualism correlate slightly positively (r = .20) but barely significantly (p = .05; N = 96) with those in DutyJoy. One reason is that Scandinavian Europeans are located in the middle of the African-Asian genetic distance but score on one polar end of the DistrustTrust dimension: they are high on Trust. The eigenvalues for these three factors are 4.9 (Factor 1), 3.2 (Factor 2), and 2.5 (Factor 3), and the fourth factor has an eigenvalue that drops below 1 (eigenvalue is .89), which is the usual cutoff to decide on the number of factors. VIF = variance inflation factor; OLS = ordinary least squares. In addition, they place a higher degree of importance on leisure time, act as they please and spend money as they wish. Third, despite the relative stability, our analyses show that cultural change is also significant. While national scores on LTO were originally available only for a limited number of countries, Hofstede et al. Femininity is seen to be the trait which stress caring and nurturing While Hofstede is known for identifying several dimensions of cross-cultural variation, Ingleharts key contribution consists in a dynamic theory of cultural change. On the contrary, femininity represents a preference for modesty, cooperation, quality of life and caring for the weak. WVS = World Values Surveys; EVS = European Values Studies. In collectivist cultures, people perceive themselves as closely linked to their in-group, tend to take the norms and duties prevalent in the in-group as guiding, and attach high importance to their relationship with other members of their in-group. Singelis T. M., Triandis H. C., Bhawuk D. P. S., Gelfand M. (1995). Hofstedes current framework consists of six dimensions for which the country scores can be downloaded from his website (www.geerthofstede.com). Higher scores on the first dimension of CollectivismIndividualism imply higher scores on Hofstedes Individualism (and lower on Power Distance). For example, a country with a high femininity score is likely to have better maternity leave policies and more affordable child care. Hofstedes dimensions have been found to correlate with a variety of other country difference variables, including: For example, countries that share a border tend to have more similarities in culture than those that are further apart. Enter your email to receive articles from leading executives, networking opportunities, industry discounts and more! These cohort-specific effects capture the generational shift conditional on the level of economic development and unique country-specific factors. They are happy to have few rules and prefer less structured rather than more tightly structured contexts. The project identified a fifth, until then unknown, dimension (yet also failed to confirm the existence of the Uncertainty Avoidance dimension and highlighted the correlated nature of Individualism and Power Distance). Inglehart and Baker (2000) show that, despite cultural change in a common direction, countries have a unique historical past that continues to shape their national cultures (see also Inglehart & Welzel, 2005). We discuss the implications for cross-national cultural research. In the process of synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart, our exploratory analysis reconfirms the concerns regarding the number and meaning of the original Hofstede dimensions of cross-cultural variation, leading to a newly validated set of three cultural dimensions for which we then examine the evidence for cultural change. In educational settings, people from countries high in uncertainty avoidance expect their teachers to be experts with all of the answers. Below, we correlate these country-specific factors for the three dimensions with a series of exogenous variables related to precolonial opportunity endowments embodied in geography and subsequent colonial histories (a detailed overview of these variables and their sources can be found in Online Appendix Table A8). These differences may seem rather small, but one should keep in mind that these are the result after controlling for cohort- and country-fixed effects. National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations, Generational difference: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium, Research note: Hofstedes consequences, a study of reviews, citations and consequences, Generations: The history of Americas future, 15842089, Examining the impact of cultures consequences: A three-decade, multi-level, meta-analytic review of Hofstedes cultural value dimensions, Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstedes dimensions, The next America: Boomers, millennials, and the looming generational showdown, No evidence that an Ebola outbreak influenced voting preferences in the 2014 elections after controlling for time-series autocorrelation: A commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016), A theory of individualism and collectivism, Handbook of theories of social psychology, Individualism-Collectivism and personality. . We then re-explore the dimensional structure of item sets used by Hofstedes based on the WVS-EVS. Masculinity is seen to be the trait which emphasizes This dimension deals with the fact that all individuals in societies are not equal it expresses the attitude of the culture towards these inequalities amongst us. To date, this non-replicability at the individual level is often poorly understood and, therefore, a source of false concerns of whether one can trust such aggregate-level patterns as those revealed by our study. A visual inspection of these figures highlights two interesting observations. Two other dimensions were added in later years by Hofstede and independent researchers: long-term orientation and indulgence vs. self-restraint. Hofstede, G. (2011). They dislike ambiguity. By contrast, there is (c) no clear shift from Distrust toward Trust or vice versa, no matter how socioeconomic development proceeds. Figure 8 shows the values of the DutyJoy dimension. Which dimensions matter for long-run growth? Of these 20, nine need to be dropped because of very limited coverage across waves (typically only one or two waves are covered in those nine cases). In countries with low power distance index values, there tends to be more equality between parents and children, with parents more likely to accept it if children argue or talk back to authority. From Hofstede (2001), Cultures Consequences, 2nd However, the results of the Meanwhile, societies with low power distance seek to have an equal distribution of power. At the beginning of Hofstede's research, there were four cultural dimensions: individualism vs collectivism, masculinity vs femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance. Response to geert hofstede. Masculinity and Femininity This dimension looks at the extent to which a culture supports a traditional view of masculine and feminine traits. Climato-economic origins of variation in ingroup favoritism, Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. As many times as Ingleharts work has been cited, it has been criticizedand often quite strongly so. Hofstede's cultural dimensions and differences across cultures Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. This raises the question of whether these remote historic drivers can account for significant variance portions in country-specific factors andif yesfor how much. This dimension looks at how much a society values traditional masculine and feminine roles. The U.S. ranks very high in individualism, and South Korea ranks quite low. Normative societies. Economic development and generational shifts account for approximately half of the variation in cultural change. We would note that we have also used the two alternative combinations of items in the construction of our CollectivismIndividualism dimensions as dependent variables. Having established which items are included in what dimension, we went back to the original survey data. Although there is a certain degree of inequality in all societies, Hofstede notes that there is relatively more equality in some societies than in others. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, Groningen 9700 AV, The Netherlands. Hofstede, Inglehart, modernization theory, culture, globalization, European Values Studies, World Values Survey, generation, Mirror, mirror on the wall: Cultures consequences in a value test of its own design. Individualist cultures replace the individuals dependence on particular support groups, especially family and acquaintances, by a more anonymous form of dependence on impartial institutions and universal norms. We observe a similar pattern in our WVS-EVS analysis. According to Geert Hofstede, a Dutch social psychologist, there are four dimensions to cultures around the world. We exclude this item, thereby increasing the country coverage from 67 to 104; the correlation between the three-item factor score and the four-item factor score is .97, suggesting that this exclusion does not affect relative country rankings. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. R. (2007). Psychologist Dr. Geert Hofstede published his cultural dimensions model at the end of the 1970s, based on a decade of research. We also observe a change in the direction of less trust and more distrust, but these changes are relatively small compared with the cultural change observed for Individualism and Joy. First, our finding on the stability of the countries relative cultural position suggests that these measures will not be outdated any time soon and that findings using these measures will not be significantly affected by temporal variation, as long as the country scores are interpreted in a relative sense. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help By contrast, if one lets the data decide if the 20 items cohere in two clearly distinct dimensions, the answer is a resounding No: There is just one dimension, which is mostly due to the fact that the traditional end in Traditional versus Secular-rational Values and the survival end in Survival versus Self-expression Values are highly convergent (Li & Bond, 2010). Its opposite, Femininity, stands for a preference for cooperation, modesty, caring for the weak and quality of life. Proponents of multiple modernities, by contrast, insist that cultural differences along civilizational faultlines will prevail, if not increase in what Huntington (1996) described as a clash of civilizations.. Indulgence Power Distance Index Power Distance Index In contrast, Hofstede says a feminine culture or feminine society is one where gender roles are more fluid. Those of higher status may also regularly experience obvious displays of subordination and respect from subordinates. A correlation between the country scores on this dimension and other WVS-EVS items shows that countries that score low on this second dimension (i.e., emphasizing restraint) score high on the importance of hard work as an important child quality, and that people are in need because they are lazy. Masculinity - Clearly Cultural The assertive pole has been called masculine and the modest, caring pole feminine. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Masculinity vs. femininity refers to a dimension that describes the extent to which strong distinctions exist between mens and womens roles in society. Former Soviet Union (N = 15; Nrespondents = 81,978) include Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, and Ukraine (only the score of Russia [32] is known for the first cohort). This Masculinity and Femininity dimension of culture is often considered as the Marketing dimension. Finally, we control for first order autocorrelation by estimating a fixed effect panel with cluster adjusted standard error (Greene, 2008).15. To begin with CollectivismIndividualism, country specificities in this dimension correlate at an exceptional strength (r = .86) with how early female fertilities started to decline in a country (N = 69). % of people who say that country is run by big interest, Important child quality: thrift saving money and things, % of people who say that thrift is important, Taking all things together, would you say you are, Please indicate how much freedom of choice and control you feel you have over the way your life turns out, 1. The generation born after 1980 scorescontrolling for GDP per capita and country-fixed effects25 points higher on Individualism and Joy and 17 points lower on Trust compared with the generation born between 1900 and 1920 (on a 0-100 scale). This becomes evident from the results of a factor analysis on Hofstedes six dimensions as shown in Table 1. This study encompassed over 100,000 employees from 50 countries across three regions. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism. South Korea scores 39 on this dimension and is thus considered a Feminine society. Country-Level Factor Analysis 15 WVS-EVS Questions. After establishing that first order autocorrelation (AR1) is present, we control for AR1 by estimating a panel-fixed effects model where we correct our standard errors for any kind of serial autocorrelation and/or heteroscedasticity. For CollectivismIndividualism, the score increases by four points from 44 in the first wave to 48 in the last wave (N = 46 countries). For example, individualism vs. collectivism can help explain why some cultures place more emphasis on personal achievement than others. Utilizing these . Masculinity is seen to be the trait which emphasizes ambition, acquisition of wealth, and differentiated gender roles. Comparative historical GDP data are taken from the Maddison Project 2013 Update (Bolt & van Zanden, 2014).17 The second series of models (Models 2, 5, and 8) show results for the balanced panel for 65 countries including GDP per capita, country-fixed effects, and now include cohort-fixed effects. We re-scale the three dimensions on a 0 to 100 scale for ease of interpretation. Many of the commercials we see are either very (over the top) Feminine or very (over the top) Masculine. Finally, a replication of Hofstedes study, conducted across 93 separate countries, confirmed the existence of the five dimensions and identified a sixth known as indulgence and restraint (Hofstede & Minkov, 2010). Pairwise Correlations Between 15 WVS-EVS Items and Hofstedes Dimensions (p < .05). This means that there is no supporting time-trend effect in Individualism and Joy, so that cohort replacement alone shifted the mean upward. Whether the use of Hofstedes data is legitimate from a temporal perspective depends on the nature of cultural change (Beugelsdijk, Maseland, & van Hoorn, 2015; Ralston, 2008). Conceptually, hegemonic masculinity proposes to explain how and why men maintain dominant social roles over women, and other gender identities, which are perceived as feminine in a given society. Below is an example: Comments? This can be explained by the the combination of a high Masculinity drive together with the most Individualist drive in the world. Meanwhile, in countries with high power distance, parents may expect children to obey without questioning their authority. To develop our multidimensional framework and to put it into the dynamic perspective of cultural change, we pool nation-level culture measures across all waves of the WVS and European Values Studies (EVS). In Masculine countries people "live in order to work", managers are expected to be decisive and assertive, the emphasis is on equity, competition . Indeed, people can be hard working out of passion and plan for the future and nevertheless indulge in joyful moments in life. There are three possible outcomes regarding cultural change: (a) there is no cultural change, in which case country scores and rankings remain the same; (b) there is cultural change but it does not follow a uniform trend, instead showing recessive shifts in some countries but progressive ones in others; and (c) there is cultural change and it does follow a uniform trend in that most countries move in the same direction, whether recessive or progressive. The online appendix (Table A11) shows the unique country-specific scores for each dimension (Figure A2 in the online appendix visualizes the country scores for two dimensions). And long-term vs. short-term orientation can help explain why some cultures focus more on the future than the present (Hofstede, 2011). The country scores on items with a Likert-type scale (often 1-10) are calculated as averages. Finally, the restraint and indulgence dimension considers the extent and tendency of a society to fulfill its desires. This depiction is a most serious misinterpretation. In both cases, cohorts are only included when at least 100 respondents are included in each cohort. According to Hofstede (1997: 161), the resulting Chinese Values Survey overlapped with three of Hofstedes dimensions: power distance, individualism, and masculinity although not with the uncertainty avoidance dimension. Interestingly, the time trend has affected the older cohorts in the earliest survey more than the younger cohorts, for which reason the cohort differences appear evened out at the latest survey. Figure 2 shows the results for DutyJoy and Figure 3 for DistrustTrust. For sources and meaning of historic driver variables, see online appendix. Vertical distance from the Isoline indicates the amount of change. This is because people who live close to each other are more likely to interact with each other on a regular basis, which leads to a greater understanding and appreciation of each others cultures. This increase on Individualism and Joy suggests there is no evidence that the upward-sloping cohort patterns during the earliest survey reflect a life cycle effect. Our finding on the relative stability of country rankings implies that cultural distance scores, too, are relatively stable over the period considered in our article. Femininity stands for a society in which social gender roles overlap: Both men and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life. From Hofstede (2001), Cultures Consequences, 2nd ed. The final result is shown in Table 6. Together, Hofstede and Inglehart have received over 200,000 citations, making them two of the worlds most frequently quoted social scientists (Google Scholar). Cultural change CollectivismIndividualism. So these two cultures share, in terms of masculinity, similar values. All these studies focus on replicating one or more of the dimensions as such, but they have not addressed cultural change over time. Meanwhile, a country with a low femininity score is likely to have more women in leadership positions and higher rates of female entrepreneurship (Hofstede, 1980). Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory has had a significant impact on the field of cross-cultural psychology and . Hofstedes cultural dimensions are widely used to understand etiquette and facilitate communication across cultures in areas ranging from business to diplomacy. In fact, the Autonomy versus Embeddedness and Self-Enhancement versus Self-Transcendence dimensions underlying the Schwartz value space depict the two dimensions of the InglehartWelzel world map of cultures in a 45 rotated manner (Welzel, 2013). The World Values Surveys (WVS) is the ideal database for this purpose. This is obvious from the fact that the upward-sloping cohort patterns in Individualism and Joy remain basically unchanged and run closely parallel throughout the two points in time. He later added two more dimensions using the World Values Surveys (WVS; Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010). A high score (Masculine) on this dimension indicates that the society will be driven by competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner/best in field a value system that starts in school and continues throughout organisational life. Hofstede reports six replication studies (Hofstede et al., 2010). Here, we calculate the country-fixed effect that results after taking economic development and autonomous cohort effects into account. Country-Level Correlations of Additional Items With the Three Dimensions. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis, Physioeconomics: The basis for long-run economic growth, Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence, International Journal of Management Reviews, Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, The crossvergence perspective: Reflections and projections, Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications, Cultural dimensions of values: Toward an understanding of national differences, Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications, Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world, Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective, Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Returning to Hofstede's cultural information dimensions model concerned with masculinity, in which the nation of China scored a sixty-six in comparison to the world average of 49.53. Emergence: Aligning Purpose and Profit Summit, WITI Member Orientation, Update and Networking, Advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence.
